HOME NEWS THEMES CONTACT
May 9, 2008 by Paul in 'Fun, Geeky, OS'

In an experiment to find out the popularity of different operating systems with illegal file sharers, I thought I would query isohunt.com to give me the answer..

There are two numbers associated with every download. Firstly you have the number of seeds. These people have a complete copy of the files, and are purely uploading them to share with others. Secondly you have the leechers. These second type of people are both downloading and uploading - although they don’t have complete copies of the files. So seeds are the people allowing others to get access to the files, and are an indication of interpreted demand (how much they themselves think people might want the OS), and also past demand, while the leechers are an indication of the current demand. Or at least, that’s how I see it. So how did the different OS’s fair?

Windows Vista

Vista is, surprisingly after all the bad press, one of the most sought after OS’s in my test! With 1142 people actively trying to get hold of this particular version, the demand is higher than any other. Interestingly there are only 303 seeds. This (rightly or wrongly) says to me that not many people are hanging onto it once they get it!

Windows XP

In a not-so-surprising twist - Windows XP has the largest number of seeds for any OS. At 656, a lot of people are hanging on to this. Is it because they’ve read the news and think people will want it more? Or are they just lazy? Equally as interesting in the number of leechers, at 152, it appears not many people actually want it. Now you could argue it’s because most of us have a copy now, of one description or another..

OSX Leopard

Apple’s latest OS is looking strong amongst the Windows contenders. A lot stronger than recent years, which probably shows a move away from Microsoft for the home user towards something a little more intuitive. I’m sure all you Mac users out there will have smug faces on now..

Windows 98

Wow - now this is pretty cool. 10 years after it’s official launch, Windows 98 is still going strong with a lot of interest. 202 people have the OS available, although demand is a little low with a meagre 58 leechers.

Windows 2000

Demand is pretty low for this OS - a lot lower than I thought it would be. I was expecting half to a third that of Windows XP. I thought Windows 2000 was a solid OS and I’ve still got it running on a few PCs at work - and it never gives me any problems.

OSX Tiger

Incompatibility problems with PC architecture probably are the reasons this OS is so far down the list. Not a bad OS, and not particularly old, I think it’s just the superior Leopard that’s always more likely to be a hit with intel-based PC pirates looking for a change.

Windows 95

20 Seeds? Who are these people? Sure Windows 95 was groundbreaking, but only for a couple of years until Windows 98 came along! And that lonely leecher, downloading it in the hope it will work on the old 486 he found in his dad’s garage. I have one piece of advice for you my friend - Linux. It’s a question, and answer and a solution all in one word.

Windows 3.1

I was half expecting a “no show” for 3.1. How surprised I was to find, although demand is 0, there are still people that have a copy of the OS on their systems for anyone that might be passing - and only 5 less than Windows 95! I can’t think of a use for this OS nowadays of course, the hardware it was destined to run on has probably rotted away by now at the bottom of some garbage heap somewhere.

Windows ME

No graphics for this one. Why? I couldn’t find it! Please don’t think I want a link to it, I made sure I did the most basic search, hopefully copying what a normal pirate would type into the search box. I guess you could try different search terms, but why would you repeatedly try to find this OS? Is this the biggest OS mistake Microsoft ever made? Or is that happening now?

So what does this all mean?

Well, to be honest, I’m not entirely sure.. On the face of it, the demand for Vista is strong. Windows XP has a strong perceived demand, by the seeds that are keeping it available for other potential downloaders. Windows 98 is still “downloadble” now, 10 years later, and Windows 95 is just a poor cousin of Windows 98, as we’ve always thought. Windows 3.1 is available for the hardcore elite, and Windows ME will always be the mutated-dog-from-the-fly-2 we love to look in disgust at.

Finally, I thought this wouldn’t be a balanced test, without the most talked-about OS amongst geeks - although it is also worth noting that this is a free OS - read into that what you will with the figures, but I presume it’s because people have 0 hangups about downloading a free OS, where they may have moral issues with pirating software.. Anyway, ladies and gentleman, I give you:

Ubuntu 7.10

How many seeds????


12 Comments

Comment on Saturday, May 10th, 2008 @ 4:45 pm by Ka11aDr1n

hmm….223319 as compared to 303….and 51680 as compared to 1142….i think someone cluster fucked their products desirability….

Comment on Saturday, May 10th, 2008 @ 7:20 pm by Terry

awww all my comments gone by a silly captcha =/

Comment on Saturday, May 10th, 2008 @ 10:52 pm by Drunken

OSX doesn’t need to many seeds, Macs come with all the software, and Ubuntu is so popular now that doesn’t surprise me, but it does make me gleeful that it’s doing so well. You might want to update it to Ubuntu 8.xxx Hardy Heron, I’d be curious to see how thats doing.

Comment on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 @ 2:42 am by Jon

Hardy Heron is at 1722 and 1155 respectively. Compatibility problems have arisen with this version, so demand isn’t as high for 8.04 as it is for 7.10. I myself rolled back to 7.10 because I couldn’t access the series of tubes that is the Internet.

Comment on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 @ 6:22 am by oniq

Maybe because downloading the other ones is illegal?

Comment on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 @ 7:04 am by Ryan

It would seem logical that more people would delete the 3 gig OS(vista) before 600 meg (XP) This would make sense for the six and a half gig leopard as well.

Comment on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 @ 9:00 am by someone else

Did you accumulate all torrents distributing the software, as i am thinking that their is many different torrents running - might produce an overall different result. The Ubuntu score is kind of invalid, as it is free, and the website links a torrent as a legitimate download method.

Whats more interesting is the older versions of the OS’s, shows some people are either still using it - gasp, or people are poking around with it for fun. Would be interesting to reinstall 98 again, i used to know it off by heart, now i cannot remember what it even looks like.

Comment on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 @ 9:31 am by Paul

98 Looks like 95, 2000/NT4 etc. Just disable your themes in XP or Vista if you’re that nostalgic! =)

I mentioned the searches I did were just the most basic, to get the first torrent on the list. For instance, if you search for Ubuntu, there are two - the desktop one, and the full one (I presume with the server version included etc.)

I think what I’m trying to say is that I tried to make it as if the average Joe was doing a search for an OS, found it on isohunt, and just hit the download torrent button on the first thing he/she found.

But I agree about 98. If it supported today’s games/apps/CPUs/memory configs I would still use it today.

Comment on Tuesday, May 13th, 2008 @ 3:21 am by None

most likely its because no one has any reason to get those torrents from there. Why download xp and all that when you’ve probably already got it to begin with.

Comment on Tuesday, May 13th, 2008 @ 3:22 am by None

oh and who is to say those are even legit heh.

Comment on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 @ 6:15 pm by Anonymous

Stupid and pointless survey…

Of course people dont need to download vista, its installed on all the new computers already, and old ones generally cant manage it… (same goes for different versions of vista, you wouldnt download ultimate if you bought a crappy computer that came with basic because it wouldnt run)

Linux sucks, it doesnt work with hardware, it doesnt run software, it is entirely pointless… there is NOTHING linux has that you cant get on a MAC or PC…

Comment on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 @ 8:47 pm by Paul

I’ve tried all the OS’s and they all have their strengths & weaknesses - I think you’re missing the point of the data.

This is not a “that OS is better than the other OS” sort of deal - This is more of what the average person thinks is worthy of downloading. I leave that to you how to use that information. I think it reflects on how people feel about the OS’s, but again you might feel differently about the results.

Anybody care to comment on some of the points raised so far? =)

Subscribe to this post's comments with RSS / Trackback for this post

Leave a comment